Government & Public Sector
Your district holds records about minors.
That data deserves architecture, not just a vendor promise.
Student records, IEPs, staff communications, and counseling notes carry duties that predate AI — FERPA, state privacy laws, and the basic obligation to protect information about minors.
We help districts and charter networks deploy private AI inside their own infrastructure, so educators get the benefits of modern tools without routing student data through a vendor whose retention policies the district didn't write.
The Case
Why in-house AI matters for schools and districts.
FERPA boundaries
Student education records fall under FERPA. Many public-cloud AI vendors will not sign FERPA-aligned agreements, and those that will are making contractual — not architectural — guarantees. Private infrastructure makes the boundary physical.
Data about minors
Most K–12 records involve minors. The sensitivity of that data — and the duty to protect it — exceeds what a general-purpose AI vendor treats as default.
District liability
Districts carry direct liability for data handling by staff and vendors. Owning the infrastructure means owning the posture, with nothing hidden in a third-party vendor's policies.
Budget reality
Per-seat AI licensing across a district adds up fast and scales with headcount rather than value. A capital investment in private infrastructure is predictable and doesn't grow with every new employee.
Capabilities
What we build for education organizations.
IEP & documentation drafting
Assist special-education and counseling staff with drafting, summarization, and consistency checks — keeping student data inside district infrastructure.
Policy knowledge base
A private RAG system over district policy, Ed Code, and operational procedures that administrators and staff can query in natural language.
Parent communication drafting
Draft consistent, accurate parent-facing communications across sites and languages — with student and family data never leaving the district network.
Every district is different.
Size, SIS, and existing stack all shape what makes sense. We start with a conversation, not a proposal.